Archive for November, 2009

One of the great­est sources of alien­ation and dis­il­lu­sion for pro­fes­sional musi­cians is the pro­found sense that their deep love of music and life­long com­mit­ment to devel­op­ing their skill, is com­pletely invis­i­ble and unap­pre­ci­ated by non-musicians. It’s easy to becom­ing bit­ter when you see a crowd jump out of their seats for ‘The Chicken Dance’ at a wed­ding, yet the orig­i­nal piece of music you have rehearsed for weeks is com­pletely ignored and/or mis­un­der­stood by the few peo­ple that hear it (often friends show­ing up out of sym­pa­thy for the dis­en­fran­chised artist). There is a ten­dency to try to bal­ance this phe­nom­ena by dumb­ing down the music, mak­ing a more ‘com­mer­cial’ record, hir­ing a mediocre singer sim­ply because they look good on stage and bring in a crowd. This only leads to fur­ther­ing the dis­tance between musi­cian and lis­tener, deep­en­ing the cycle of bit­ter­ness and iso­la­tion (“…nobody likes my stuff any­way, so I’ll just climb into a hole and write really weird music…”). We want oth­ers to be as moved by music as we are. Why is this so dif­fi­cult for many of us to achieve? The expla­na­tion for this phe­nom­ena, and the way out of the artist’s conun­drum, is under­stand­ing The Curse of Knowl­edge. This prin­ci­ple is well artic­u­lated in Chip and Dan Heath’s book, “Made To Stick”, which I heartily rec­om­mend. The idea is that, once we know some­thing, it is very dif­fi­cult to imag­ine what our expe­ri­ence would be with­out that knowl­edge. A pro­fes­sional musi­cian has spent years devel­op­ing their abil­ity to hear,…

In a recent sur­vey by British think tank Demos, researcher Peter Brad­well found that music lis­ten­ers who par­tic­i­pated in ille­gal file shar­ing behav­ior spent more money on music than lis­ten­ers who did not admit to using ille­gal ser­vices. Two key par­a­digm shifts cre­ated by Inter­net dis­tri­b­u­tion come to mind: Dis­tri­b­u­tion, whether as playlists, rec­om­men­da­tions, or down­loads, is largely con­trolled by fans, not record labels or con­tent cre­ators. The per unit cost of ‘dig­i­tal copies’ is essen­tially zero. This cre­ates a sit­u­a­tion in which even an unli­censed trans­ac­tion has value for the con­tent owner; a pos­si­ble new fan, and mar­ket­ing data. The first chal­lenge is to lever­age that value. The sec­ond is cre­at­ing legit ser­vices that pro­vide a vastly bet­ter user expe­ri­ence than ille­gal file shar­ing at a com­pet­i­tive price. In addi­tion, why not sim­ply license file shar­ing behav­ior, lev­el­ing the mar­ket­place? I know, eas­ier said than done. The issues of copy­right infringe­ment are sig­nif­i­cant, but a major road­block is the com­plex­ity of the tra­di­tional roy­alty model. Peo­ple will pay for inno­v­a­tive, supe­rior prod­ucts. Apple is a great exam­ple. Every­one grum­bles about the pro­pri­etary nature of their busi­ness model, but folks are still lin­ing up for iPhones in a reces­sion. The music indus­try has the poten­tial to trans­form itself, ush­er­ing in a new era of com­pelling, com­pet­i­tive, Inter­net mar­ket­ing and dis­tri­b­u­tion ser­vices. Exe­cut­ing will take hard work, vision­ary think­ing, and cooperation.